Comparison of monosodium iodoacetate model of osteoarthritis between in-vivo and ex-vivo osteochondral unit in rabbits

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

assessment of deep word knowledge in elementary and advanced iranian efl learners: a comparison of selective and productive wat tasks

testing plays a vital role in any language teaching program. it allows teachers and stakeholders, including program administrators, parents, admissions officers and prospective employers to be assured that the learners are progressing according to an accepted standard (douglas, 2010). the problems currently facing language testers have both practical and theoretical implications but the first i...

comparison of catalytic activity of heteropoly compounds in the synthesis of bis(indolyl)alkanes.

heteropoly acids (hpa) and their salts have advantages as catalysts which make them both economically and environmentally attractive, strong br?nsted acidity, exhibiting fast reversible multi-electron redox transformations under rather mild conditions, very high solubility in polar solvents, fairly high thermal stability in the solid states, and efficient oxidizing ability, so that they are imp...

15 صفحه اول

comparison of the accuracy of novapex apex locator and radiographic method: in vivo/ex vivo study

introduction: determination of the canal working length with radiographs has many drawbacks. electronic apex locators have been developed to overcome some of these problems. recently, a newly designed apex locator called novapex has been introduced. all the studies conducted to determine the accuracy of novapex have been carried out in-vitro on extracted teeth. the aim of this in vivo study was...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma

سال: 2019

ISSN: 0976-5662

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.023